Review of Mini60 Antenna Analyzer

I mentioned in a previous post that I had purchased a Mini60 antenna analyzer. I am going to post a quick review on this device now that I have had a chance to use it. The Mini60 is a Chinese made copy of the Sark100 antenna analyzer developed by Melchor Varela, EA4FRB. This was originally an antenna analyzer provided in kit form. He has since discontinued production of the SARK100 kit and is now building a much better featured analyzer called the Sark110 which sells for about $389. It should be noted that although the Mini60 is a derivative of the Sark100, Melchor provides no support of any kind to these devices nor is he associated with their manufacturers.


The Mini60 is sold on Ebay from a variety of sellers with the average street price of about $130 delivered. This review focuses solely on the ones marked Mini60. I mention this because there are similar devices marked as SARK100 that also sell on Ebay for about $100. The Mini60 arrived at my QTH in a box and was wrapped in bubble pack. Nothing else arrives with it. No manual, no cables…just the device itself. It turns out that the instructions for operating the SARK100 apply completely to the Mini60. The following are links to the most useful files available for the Mini60:

The SARK100 Manual

The SARK100 Basic PC Control Software

Zplots for the Sark100

The complete archive of the Sark100 can still be found on Melchor’s website here. Regarding the manual, you can skip the sections devoted to assembly and test of the Sark100. The interesting bits are related to how to operate the Mini60 as well as items in the appendix on using a serial link for PC control. The Basic PC control software is DOS based software which allows you to run a sweep across a range of frequencies and saves the collected data into a comma delimited (.csv) file. This file can be opened within the Zplots Excel spreadsheet for graphic display of a variety of antenna measurements. Note that the Mini60 can be used stand-alone but the addition of the PC based sweeps provides considerably more data across a wider range of frequencies.

The Mini60 is powered either by its internal rechargeable battery or by an external 12V power supply (not included). I typically plug the Mini60 into a USB port for charging of its internal batteries. One thing to be careful of is that if the device is left on for more than a minute or so it shuts down to save power. It is important to note that this only shuts down the display and continues to draw current if the power switch remains in the “on” position. The timeout can be adjusted but I have on occasion drained the batteries by forgetting to switch the power back to “off” after a timeout.

The Mini60 is built solidly with a sturdy metal case. It is about the size of a pack of cigarettes. There is a single PL-259 connector for attachment of the antenna or feedline, a single power switch a mini-USB port and an external power port for 12V DC. Upon Power up it displays frequency, SWR and impedance magnitude. The device powers up in impedance mode by default. Other modes include complex impedance, capacitance, inductance and off mode. The off mode can be used to measure any RF feilds in the vicinity. Frequency coverage is from 1Mhz to 60Mhz in 13 bands. Pressing scan will scan across the selected frequency band and will beep when an SWR match below 2:1 if found. After a successful scan, the device will display the bandwidth and be set on the frequency of the minimum SWR found.

The Set button allows the device to adjust step size, suspend timeout, calibration and the PC link functions. I’ll describe the operation of the PC link functions is a separate post.

Overall, I have found the Mini60 easy to use. I verified the output frequency with an oscilloscope and found good matching. The default suspend timeout is a bit short but is easily extended. I like the USB charging feature and PC link function. The PC link feature is a key feature for me and now that I have used it I would not want to use an analyzer that did not have some sort of data download feature. The analyzer made short work of setting up a homemade Buddistick antenna on both 20m and 10m and is very useful in comparing actual with modeled antenna results.

The only negatives I have noticed have been fairly minor. Adjusting the frequency is a bit tedious particularly at the band crossings. This can be compensated by running a PC link sweep but that is not always convenient as a PC is required. The Inductance measurement feature on its own is somewhat strange. I get different readings on different bands. I ultimately used a series RLC circuit with the L being unknown and running a frequency sweep with the PC link feature. It is fairly easy to find the inductance value by reading the frequency of minimum SWR on the sweep and calculating the Inductance value. I’d say that the inductance values are only good within 15 to 20%.

For $130 this has turned out to be a handy and useful tool. Used analyzers can often be found for similar pricing but lack the PC link feature that really differentiates this unit at this price point. I plan to keep using it and will update if there are any quality issues noted down the road.


14 responses to “Review of Mini60 Antenna Analyzer

  1. Hal AC0AX April 8, 2015 at 9:56 pm

    Did you get the Bluetooth equipped version? I just received mine and it works great with my android phone. If you need the software for it here is the website I got mine from. The website is in Italian but the software is in English.


  2. Mikhail Khelik August 29, 2015 at 9:05 pm

    Does it measure C and L acurately? Mine always show 0 capacity…


  3. Michael July 25, 2016 at 8:30 am

    Hi. I just got my MINI60 in the post today, no software or indication where to get the Android App from. It is not on Google Play Store!
    Any ideas please? Thanks. Michael ZL3AX


  4. Alex October 18, 2016 at 1:20 am

    Did you have to calibrate this at all before you started using it?


    • rjbono October 18, 2016 at 1:27 am

      No calibration was needed. I did verify the frequency output with a counter as there were some complaints noted on the Internet. It measured out fine. If I recall correctly, there is a review on eham that did a comparison with an mfj analyzer.


  5. N3ZRR January 13, 2017 at 11:18 am

    Rec’d in Dec 2016. Non-standard threading on SO239. Otherwise fine. Verified DDS w Optoelectronics Freq counter. Dead on. Software hard to find. Unit is VERY useful, and user friendly. Prefer it over miniVNA, except for software. Bluetooth to Android App perfect for portability. PC software better of course. But Android App EZ to use and glitch free.


    • Michael January 21, 2017 at 8:31 am

      ZL3AX (J87AB / G0GPX). I got one from China. Very pleased. I got he supplier to tell me where to get the Android app, and PC software – and after a couple of days they did. They tried hard to success, and please – and they did. Yes the SO259 is not what we are used to, so I cut off half of the outer rim of a PL259, so a couple of turns screw on- end of issue…


  6. F6AWU November 27, 2017 at 7:21 am

    Bonjour, j’ai reçu il y a un mois mon analyseur MR-300 équivalent du Sark100/Mini60 .Je l’ai relié à une charge 50 ohms ROS de 1/1 SUPER!! je l’ai ensuite relié à une antenne parfaitement accordée et la ROS> 10 ????? j’ai relié l’appareil à un fréquencemètre: le fréquence de sortie ne correspond pas du tout à la fréquence affichée : le DDS est en cause! Après contrôle et analyse je me suis rendu compte que le DDS implanté sur le circuit imprimé est un AD9850 à la place du AD9851 prévu!!!!! Ne cherchez pas plus loin ! je ne suis pas le seul victime et je pense que bon nombre d’appareils de ce type on la même anomalie…..!Alors prudence si vous commandez un tel appareil!!! 73’s à tous


    • rjbono November 27, 2017 at 2:23 pm

      Thanks for the comment on the problem with the Mini60 frequency output. I did see some time ago when I bought mine that several people had purchased Sark100 types with a frequency output problem. At the time the Mini60 did not seem to have the same issue which I confirmed when I bought mine. Unfortunately with so many manufacturers in China for these I suspect that quality and change control not be the best so buyer beware! You can dio a web search on this and I am sure you will come across others that have had the same issue.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: